Skip to main content
BAR Publishing
  • Help
  • About
  • Publish with BAR
  • Newsletter

Your use of this Platform is subject to BAR’s End User License Agreement. Please read it carefully. Materials on the Platform are for the use of authorised users only. Giving access in any form to non-authorised users is prohibited.

Share the story of what Open Access means to you

a graphic of a lock that is open, the universal logo for open access

University of Michigan needs your feedback to better understand how readers are using openly available ebooks. You can help by taking a short, privacy-friendly survey.

  1. Home
  2. A "Splendid Idiosyncrasy": Prehistory at Cambridge 1915-50

A "Splendid Idiosyncrasy": Prehistory at Cambridge 1915-50

Pamela Jane Smith 2009 © BAR Publishing
Restricted You do not have access to this book. How to get access.
It is often assumed that, in Britain, archaeology has always been a university-inspired course. However, the identification of qualified scientific archaeology with a formal education is a twentieth-century phenomenon. Archaeology as a waged, educated, vocational pursuit is a recent development. At the beginning of the twentieth century, there were no degree courses in archaeology, no profession or professionals, no formal controls over recruitment, nor institutionalised avenues of entry, nor established examination-based qualifying standards, certainly no faculties, textbooks, lectures, practicals, nor archaeological libraries. British universities have produced great lineages of descendants who practise archaeological specialisations the world over. Yet, it is not known why or how archaeology became a university option. There are no specific histories of how archaeology was institutionalised as a university degree subject in Great Britain and Eire. The entire history of all twentieth-century archaeologies, not just prehistoric, but classical, Romano-British, Anglo-Saxon, mediaeval and historic, can be viewed through the lens of amateur versus university professional and how these terms became defined and used. A university-based group emerged during the twentieth century, whose members gainfully asserted that anyone who was not university centred, or at least university-trained, was an amateur. It is widely accepted today that if you do not have a degree you are not a professional archaeologist. How did this happen? Who considered themselves professionals? Who preferred to be defined as amateur and how did the self-identity of archaeologists change? This work focuses on one small crucial beginning of this fascinating evolutionary process. It is the first history of its kind and is intended to be a block for the building of a broader informed history of British academic archaeology. It will hopefully set an example for other historians of archaeological institutions to follow.
Read Book Buy Book
Series
  • BAR pre-2020
  • BAR British Series pre-2020
ISBN(s)
  • 9781407321486 (ebook)
  • 9781407304304 (paperback)
BAR Number
  • B485
Subject
  • British Isles
  • History of Archaeology
Citable Link
  • Table of Contents

  • Stats

  • Front Cover
  • Title Page
  • Copyright
  • Opening Photograph
  • TABLE OF CONTENTS
  • Acronyms
  • Illustrations
  • Preface
  • Dedication and Acknowledgements
  • Foreword
  • 1 Introduction
  • 2 God, Empire and Prehistory
  • 3 Grahame Clark’s New Archaeology
  • 4 Dorothy Garrod in the Field and Faculty
  • 5 Conclusion
  • Appendix: Interviews with Archaeologists
  • References
6 views since October 14, 2019
BAR Publishing logo +44 (0)1865 310431 info@barpublishing.com www.barpublishing.com

FacebookTwitter

End User License Agreement

© BAR Publishing 2021

Powered by Fulcrum logo · Log In
x This site requires cookies to function correctly.