Skip to main content
University of Michigan Press Ebook Collection

University of Michigan Press
Ebook Collection

Browse Books Help
Get access to more books. Log in with your institution.

Your use of this Platform is subject to the Fulcrum Terms of Service.

Share the story of what Open Access means to you

a graphic of a lock that is open, the universal logo for open access

University of Michigan needs your feedback to better understand how readers are using openly available ebooks. You can help by taking a short, privacy-friendly survey.

  1. Home
  2. Books
  3. The State You See: How Government Visibility Creates Political Distrust and Racial Inequality

The State You See: How Government Visibility Creates Political Distrust and Racial Inequality

Aaron J. Rosenthal
Open Access Open Access
Read Book
  • EPUB (1.65 MB)
  • PDF (2.47 MB)
Buy Book
  • Overview

  • Contents

The State You See uncovers a racial gap in the way the American government appears in people's lives. It makes it clear that public policy changes over the last fifty years have driven all Americans to distrust the government that they see in their lives, even though Americans of different races are not seeing the same kind of government.

For white people, these policy changes have involved a rising number of generous benefits submerged within America's tax code, which taken together cost the government more than Social Security and Medicare combined. Political attention focused on this has helped make welfare and taxes more visible representations of government for white Americans. As a result, white people are left with the misperception that government does nothing for them, apart from take their tax money to spend on welfare. Distrust of government is the result. For people of color, distrust is also rampant but for different reasons. Over the last fifty years, America has witnessed increasingly overbearing policing and swelling incarceration numbers. These changes have disproportionately impacted communities of color, helping to make the criminal legal system a unique visible manifestation of government in these communities.

While distrust of government emerges in both cases, these different roots lead to different consequences. White people are mobilized into politics by their distrust, feeling that they must speak up in order to reclaim their misspent tax dollars. In contrast, people of color are pushed away from government due to a belief that engaging in American elections will yield the same kind of unresponsiveness and violence that comes from interactions with the police. The result is a perpetuation of the same kind of racial inequality that has always been present in American democracy. The State You See is essential reading for anyone interested in understanding how the American government engages in subtle forms of discrimination and how it continues to uphold racial inequality in the present day.

  • Cover
  • Title Page
  • Copyright Page
  • Dedication
  • Contents
  • List of Illustrations
  • List of Tables
  • Acknowledgments
  • One. Introduction
  • Two. Taxes and Welfare
  • Three. Police as the Face of Government
  • Four. Visible in All the Wrong Places
  • Five. Invisibility and Membership
  • Six. Black Lives Matter
  • Seven. The Politics of Visibility and Prospects for Change
  • Appendixes
    • Appendix A: Interview Protocol and Postinterview Survey
    • Appendix B: Ethnographic Research Details
    • Appendix C: Interview Information
    • Appendix D: Dataset Information and Question Wording
    • Appendix E: Full Table Results
  • Notes
  • References
  • Index
Citable Link
Published: 2023
Publisher: University of Michigan Press
License: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International license
ISBN(s)
  • 978-0-472-90332-0 (open access)
  • 978-0-472-07599-7 (hardcover)
  • 978-0-472-05599-9 (paper)
Subject
  • Race and Ethnicity
  • Political Science:Public Policy
  • Political Science:Political Behavior and Public Opinion

Resources

Search and Filter Resources

Filter search results by

Section

  • Chapter 12
  • Chapter 23
  • Chapter 31
  • Chapter 45
  • Chapter 53
  • Chapter 64
  • Online1
Filter search results by

Keyword

  • Policy Receipt3
  • Political Trust3
  • and Black Lives Matter Support2
  • Political Trust and Police Attitudes2
  • Political Trust and Political Participation2
  • more Keyword »
Filter search results by

Creator

  • Rosenthal, Aaron19
Filter search results by

Format

  • chart18
  • text1

Search Constraints

1 - 19 of 19
  • First Appearance
  • Section (Earliest First)
  • Section (Last First)
  • Format (A-Z)
  • Format (Z-A)
  • Year (Oldest First)
  • Year (Newest First)
Number of results to display per page
  • 10 per page
  • 20 per page
  • 50 per page
  • 100 per page
View results as:
List Gallery

Search Results

Line graph comparing levels of trust in government for Black and white Americans from 1958 to 2018.

Figure 1.1: Percentage of People Saying They Trust Government to do Right Most or All of the Time Across Racial Groups, 1958-2018

From Chapter 1

Figure 1.1. Sources: Pew, ANES, Gallup, ABC/Washington Post, CBS/New York Times, CNN.

Flow chart showing pathways between multiple boxes. Boxes used to indicate different stages at which social variation in government visibility can be created.

Figure 1.2: Theoretical Framework: How Socially Patterned Variation in Government Visibility is Created

From Chapter 1

Figure 1.2. Theoretical framework: How socially patterned variation in government visibility is created

Bar chart comparing use of submerged programs for whites and people of color. For each racial group, one bar shows the number of people who indicated they had received at least one submerged program and the other bar shows number of people saying they had never received a submerged program.

Figure 2.1: Use of Submerged Programs Across Racial Groups

From Chapter 2

Figure 2.1. Use of submerged programs across racial groups. Source: Social and Government Issues and Participation Survey

Bar graph comparing number of submerged programs used by whites and people of color. Bars represent predicted number of submerged programs received for individuals in each racial group.

Figure 2.2: Number of Submerged Programs Used Across Racial Groups

From Chapter 2

Figure 2.2. Number of submerged programs used across racial groups. Differences are not statistically different at p = .21. 95 percent confidence intervals shown. All other independent variables are held at their means or modes. Source: The Maxwell Poll.

Two bar graphs comparing number of submerged programs used by whites and people of color. Left panel shows a bar graph for the number of means-­tested submerged programs received. Right panel shows a bar graph for the number of universal submerged programs received. Each panel contains bars for both whites and people of color.

Figure 2.3: Type of Submerged Programs Used Across Racial Groups

From Chapter 2

Figure 2.3. Type of submerged programs used across racial groups. 95 percent confidence intervals shown. All other independent variables held at their means or modes. Source: SGIP.

Line graph comparing the relationship between police attitudes and support for limited government among whites and people of color.

Figure 3.1: Support for Limited Government and Police Attitudes Across Racial Groups

From Chapter 3

Figure 3.1. Support for limited government and police attitudes across racial groups. Slopes are statistically different at p=.02. 95 percent confidence intervals shown. All other independent variables are held at their means or modes. Source: ANES 2016.

Line graph showing the declining level of trust in government among the American public from 1958 to 2018.

Figure 4.1: Percentage of People Saying They Trust Government to do Right Most or All of the Time, 1958-2018

From Chapter 4

Figure 4.1. Percentage of people saying they trust government to do right most or all of the time, 1958–2018. Sources: Pew, ANES, Gallup, ABC/Washington Post, CBS/New York Times, CNN.

Line graph comparing the relationship between welfare attitudes and level of trust in government among whites and people of color.

Figure 4.2: Political Trust and Welfare Attitudes Across Racial Groups

From Chapter 4

Figure 4.2. Political trust and welfare attitudes across racial groups. Slopes are statistically different at p = .049. 95 percent confidence intervals shown. All other independent variables are held at their means or modes. Source: ANES 2016.

Line graph comparing the relationship between government spending attitudes and level of trust in government among whites and people of color.

Figure 4.3: Political Trust and Government Spending Attitudes Across Racial Groups

From Chapter 4

Figure 4.3. Political Trust and Government Spending Attitudes Across Racial Groups. Slopes are statistically different at p = .023. 95 percent confidence intervals shown. All other independent variables are held at their means or modes. Source: ANES 2016.

Line graph comparing the relationship between police attitudes and level of trust in government among whites and people of color.

Figure 4.4: Political Trust and Police Attitudes Across Racial Groups

From Chapter 4

Figure 4.4. Political trust and police attitudes across racial groups. Slopes are statistically different at p = .048. 95 percent confidence intervals shown. All other independent variables are held at their means or modes. Source: ANES 2016.

Line graph comparing the relationship between police attitudes and level of trust in government among whites and people of color in 1966.

Figure 4.5: Political Trust and Police Attitudes Across Racial Groups, 1966

From Chapter 4

Figure 4.5. Political trust and police attitudes across racial groups, 1966. Slopes are marginally different at p = .1. 95 percent confidence intervals shown. All other independent variables are held at their means or modes. Source: ANES 1966.

Line graph comparing levels of trust in government and turnout rates in presidential elections from 1964 to 2012.

Figure 5.1: Political Trust Levels and Turnout Rates, 1964-2012

From Chapter 5

Figure 5.1. Political trust levels and turnout rates, 1964–2012. Sources: Pew, ANES, Gallup, ABC/Washington Post, CBS/New York Times, CNN.

Four line graphs analyzing the impact of political trust on different modes of political participation. Each of these graphs analyzes this impact for whites and people of color separately. Top left panel analyzes voter turnout. Top right panel analyzes a scale of participatory acts beyond voting. Bottom left panel analyzes political invisibility. Bottom right panel analyzes protest participation.

Figure 5.2: Political Trust and Political Participation Across Racial Groups

From Chapter 5

Figure 5.2. Political trust and political participation across racial groups. 95 percent confidence intervals are shown. All other independent variables are held at their means or modes. Source: ANES 2016.

Three line graphs analyzing the impact of political trust on different modes of political participation in 1964. Each of these graphs analyzes this impact for whites and people of color separately. Top left panel analyzes voter turnout. Top right panel analyzes a scale of participatory acts beyond voting. Bottom left panel analyzes political invisibility.

Figure 5.3: Political Trust and Political Participation Across Racial Groups, 1964

From Chapter 5

Figure 5.3. Political trust and political participation across racial groups, 1964. 95 percent confidence intervals are shown. All other independent variables are held at their means or modes. Source: ANES 1964.

Line graph showing the relationship between protest participation and level of support for Black Lives Matter.

Figure 6.1: Protest Participation and Support for Black Lives Matter

From Chapter 6

Figure 6.1. Protest participation and support for Black Lives Matter. 95 percent confidence intervals are shown. Relationship is significant at p < .001.

Two line graphs analyzing the relationship between the number of participatory acts one took and their level of trust in government, looking at this for both supporters and opponents of Black Lives Matter. The left panel looks at this for people of color, while the right panel demonstrates this relationship for whites.

Figure 6.2: Scale of Participatory Acts and Political Trust Across Racial Groups and Support for Black Lives Matter

From Chapter 6

Figure 6.2. Scale of participatory acts and political trust across racial groups and support for Black Lives Matter. 95 percent confidence intervals are shown. All other independent variables are held at their means or modes. Source: ANES 2016.

Two line graphs analyzing the relationship between the probability of participating in a protest and levels of trust in government, looking at this for both supporters and opponents of Black Lives Matter. The left panel looks at this for people of color, while the right panel demonstrates this relationship for whites.

Figure 6.3: Protest Participation and Political Trust Across Racial Groups and Support for Black Lives Matter

From Chapter 6

Figure 6.3. Protest participation and political trust across racial groups and support for Black Lives Matter. 95 percent confidence intervals are shown. All other independent variables are held at their means or modes. Source: ANES 2016.

Two line graphs analyzing the relationship between levels of trust in government and levels of support for Black Lives Matter. The left panel looks at this for people of color, while the right panel demonstrates this relationship for whites.

Figure 6.4: Political Trust and Police Attitudes Across Racial Groups and Support for Black Lives Matter

From Chapter 6

Figure 6.4. Political trust and police attitudes across racial groups and support for Black Lives Matter. 95 percent confidence intervals are shown. All other independent variables are held at their means or modes. Source: ANES 2016.

Online Appendix F for The State You See: Robustness Checks

From Online

University of Michigan Press Contact Us

UMP EBC

  • Browse and Search
  • About UMP EBC
  • Impact and Usage

Follow Us

  • UMP EBC Newsletter
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • YouTube

Quicklinks

  • Help/FAQ
  • Title List
  • MARC Records
  • KBART Records
  • Usage Stats
© 2023, Regents of the University of Michigan · Accessibility · Preservation · Privacy · Terms of Service
Powered by Fulcrum logo · Log In
x This site requires cookies to function correctly.