Skip to main content
University of Michigan Press
Fulcrum logo

You can access this title through a library that has purchased it. More information about purchasing is available at our website.

Share the story of what Open Access means to you

a graphic of a lock that is open, the universal logo for open access

University of Michigan needs your feedback to better understand how readers are using openly available ebooks. You can help by taking a short, privacy-friendly survey.

  1. Home
  2. The Impracticality of Practical Research: A History of Contemporary Sciences of Change That Conserve

The Impracticality of Practical Research: A History of Contemporary Sciences of Change That Conserve

Thomas S. Popkewitz 2020
Restricted You do not have access to this book. How to get access.
There is an alluring desire that research should lead us to find the practical knowledge that enables people to live a good life in a just and equitable society. This desire haunted the 19th century emergence of the social sciences as a discipline, then became more pronounced in the postwar mobilizations of research. Today that desire lives on in the international assessments of national schools and in the structure of professional education, both of which influence government modernization of schools and also provide for people's well-being. American policy thus reflects research in which reforms are verified by "scientific, empirical evidences" about "what works" in experiments, and "will work" therefore in society.

The book explores the idea that practical and useful knowledge changes over time, and shows how this knowledge has been (re)visioned in contemporary research on educational reform, instructional improvement, and professionalization. The study of science draws on a range of social and cultural theories and historical studies to understand the politics of science, as well as scientific knowledge that is concerned with social and educational change. Research hopes to change social conditions to create a better life, and to shape people whose conduct embodies these valued characteristics—the good citizen, parent, or worker. Yet this hope continually articulates the dangers that threaten this future. Thomas Popkewitz explores how the research to correct social wrongs is paradoxically entangled with the inscription of differences that ultimately hamper the efforts to include.

Read Book Buy Book
ISBN(s)
  • 978-0-472-13173-0 (hardcover)
  • 978-0-472-12642-2 (ebook)
  • 978-0-472-03774-2 (paper)
Subject
  • Sociology
  • Education
  • Cultural Studies
Citable Link
  • Table of Contents

  • Resources

  • Stats

  • Cover
  • Title Page
  • Copyright Page
  • Dedication
  • Contents
  • Acknowledgments
  • Preface
  • Section One. The Problems and Problematics of Studying Practical Research
    • 1. Introduction
    • 2. The Reason of Research
  • Section Two. Historical Traces, Movement of Lines, and Limits in the Making of Practical Research
    • 3. The Emergence of Science as Changing Everyday Life
    • 4. Virtue in Secular Saintliness
    • 5. What Is “Really” Taught as the Problem of Research?
  • Section Three. Coming to the Present
    • 6. American Progressivism
    • 7. The Reason of “Systems” and Practical Knowledge
    • 8. Numbers, Desires, and International Student Assessments
    • 9. Teacher and Teacher Education Research
  • Section Four. A Method of Study, Critique, and Change
    • 10. The Impracticality of Practical Research
  • Notes
  • References
  • Index of Names
  • Subject Index

Search and Filter Resources

Filter search results by

Section

  • Chapter 73
Filter search results by

Keyword

  • Wisconsin R&D Center
  • elementary education reform1
  • Individually Guided Education1
  • Instructional Programming Model1
  • Multiunit Organization of an IGE school1
Filter search results by

Creator

  • Klausmeier, Herbert3
Filter search results by

Format

  • image3
Your search has returned 3 resources attached to The Impracticality of Practical Research: A History of Contemporary Sciences of Change That Conserve

Search Constraints

Filtering by: Keyword Wisconsin R&D Center Remove constraint Keyword: Wisconsin R&D Center
Start Over
1 - 3 of 3
  • First Appearance
  • Section (Earliest First)
  • Section (Last First)
  • Format (A-Z)
  • Format (Z-A)
  • Year (Oldest First)
  • Year (Newest First)
Number of results to display per page
  • 10 per page
  • 20 per page
  • 50 per page
  • 100 per page
View results as:
List Gallery

Search Results

The graph shows seven components of Individually Guided Education. 1. Multiunit organization. 2. Instructional programming for the individual student. 3. Evaluation for educational decision making. 4. Curriculum materials compatible with 2 and 3. 5. Home-school-community relations. 6. Facilitative environments. 7. Continuing research and development. The graph is a circle with individually guided education at the center of the circle and the components listed on the periphery

Major Components of Individually Guided Education

From Chapter 7

Fig. 4. Major components of Individually Guided Education. Reprinted from Individually Guided Elementary Education: Concepts and Practices (Klausmeier 1977b, 11).

The graph shows the 7 steps of instructional programming model in IGE. Step 1: state the educational objectives to be attained by the student population. Step 2: estimate the range of objectives that may be attainable for subgroups of the student population. Step 3: assess the level of achievement, learning style, and motivation level of each student by use of criterion-referenced tests, observation schedules, or work samples with appropriate-sized subgroups. Step 4: set instructional objectives for each child to attain over a short period of time. Step 5: plan and implement an instructional program suitable for each student or place the student in a preplanned program. Step 6: assess students for attainment of initial objectives. Step 7: reassess the student’s characteristics, or take other actions; implement next sequence in program, or take other actions

Instructional Programming Model in IGE

From Chapter 7

Fig. 5. Instructional programming model in IGE. Reprinted from Individually Guided Elementary Education: Concepts and Practices (Klausmeier 1977b, 16).

The graph shows multiunit organization of an IGE school of 400–600 students. The instructional improvement committee, composed of the principal and the unit leader, replaces the principal as the sole educational decision maker at the building level. The Systemwide Program Committee is a new organizational arrangement at the school district level. These three groups assume responsibility for planning, decision making, and evaluation at the three respective levels and also for communication within the school setting and between the school and the community. The multiunit school structure is operative at three interrelated hierarchical levels: the Instruction and Research (I&R) Unit at the learning-teaching level, the Instructional Improvement Committee (IIC) at the school building level, and the Systemwide Program Committee (SPC) at the school district level. Each of these groups has a designated composition and certain unique functions. The composition of each I&R Unit includes the unit leader, three staff teachers, a clerical or instructional aide, a preservice teacher intern, and 100 to 150 students (Klausmeier 1977b, 11). Students’ ages are divided into four groups: ages 4–6, ages 6–9, ages 8–11, and ages 10–12

Multiunit Organization of an IGE school of 400-600 students

From Chapter 7

Fig. 6. Multiunit organization of an IGE school of 400–600 students. Reprinted from Individually Guided Elementary Education: Concepts and Practices (Klausmeier 1977b, 12).

82 views since April 17, 2020
University of Michigan Press logo

University of Michigan Press

Powered by Fulcrum logo

  • About
  • Blog
  • Feedback
  • Contact
  • Contribute
  • Accessibility
  • Preservation
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Service
  • Log In
© University of Michigan Press 2020
x This site requires cookies to function correctly.