Skip to main content
University of Michigan Press Ebook Collection

University of Michigan Press
Ebook Collection

Browse Books Help
Get access to more books. Log in with your institution.

Your use of this Platform is subject to the Fulcrum Terms of Service.

Share the story of what Open Access means to you

a graphic of a lock that is open, the universal logo for open access

University of Michigan needs your feedback to better understand how readers are using openly available ebooks. You can help by taking a short, privacy-friendly survey.

  1. Home
  2. Books
  3. Committees and the Decline of Lawmaking in Congress

Committees and the Decline of Lawmaking in Congress

Jonathan Lewallen
Restricted You don't have access to this book. Please try to log in with your institution. Log in
Read Book Buy Book
  • Overview

  • Contents

The public, journalists, and legislators themselves have often lamented a decline in congressional lawmaking in recent years, often blaming party politics for the lack of legislative output. In Committees and the Decline of Lawmaking in Congress, Jonathan Lewallen examines the decline in lawmaking from a new, committee-centered perspective. Lewallen tests his theory against other explanations such as partisanship and an increased demand for oversight with multiple empirical tests and traces shifts in policy activity by policy area using the Policy Agendas Project coding scheme.

He finds that because party leaders have more control over the legislative agenda, committees have spent more of their time conducting oversight instead. Partisanship alone does not explain this trend; changes in institutional rules and practices that empowered party leaders have created more uncertainty for committees and contributed to a shift in their policy activities. The shift toward oversight at the committee level combined with party leader control over the voting agenda means that many members of Congress are effectively cut out of many of the institution's policy decisions. At a time when many, including Congress itself, are considering changes to modernize the institution and keep up with a stronger executive branch, the findings here suggest that strengthening Congress will require more than running different candidates or providing additional resources.

  • Cover
  • Title Page
  • Copyright Page
  • Contents
  • Preface and Acknowledgments
  • One. Committees and Congress in the Policy Process
  • Two. Myths and Realities of Congressional Lawmaking
  • Three. The Effects of Centralized Agenda Setting
  • Four. Partisanship and Committee Activity
  • Five. Demand for Committee Oversight
  • Six. The Stratified Congress
  • Seven. The Costs of Doing (Legislative) Business
  • Appendix
  • Notes
  • References
  • Index
Citable Link
Published: 2020
Publisher: University of Michigan Press
ISBN(s)
  • 978-0-472-12699-6 (ebook)
  • 978-0-472-13206-5 (hardcover)
Series
  • Legislative Politics and Policy Making
Subject
  • Political Science:American Politics
  • Political Science:Governance

Resources

Search and Filter Resources

Filter search results by

Section

  • Chapter 44
Filter search results by

Keyword

  • partisanship4
  • filibusters2
  • veto overrides2
  • divided government1
  • party cartels1
Filter search results by

Creator

  • Voteview.com
Filter search results by

Format

  • image4
Your search has returned 4 resources attached to Committees and the Decline of Lawmaking in Congress

Search Constraints

Filtering by: Creator Voteview.com Remove constraint Creator: Voteview.com
Start Over

Not finding what you are looking for? Help improve Fulcrum's search and share your feedback.

1 - 4 of 4
  • First Appearance
  • Section (Earliest First)
  • Section (Last First)
  • Format (A-Z)
  • Format (Z-A)
  • Year (Oldest First)
  • Year (Newest First)
Number of results to display per page
  • 10 per page
  • 20 per page
  • 50 per page
  • 100 per page
View results as:
List Gallery

Search Results

Trends in party polarization in each chamber from 1981 to 2018 as measured by the difference in party mean DW-NOMINATE scores.

Figure 4-1. Trends in Congressional Party Polarization, 1981-2018

From Chapter 4

Fig. 4.1. Trends in Congressional Party Polarization, 1981–2018. (Source: Voteview.com)

Trends in the distance between the average DW-NOMINATE voting score and the average majority party score in each chamber from 1981 to 2018.

Figure 4-2. Trends in Majority Party Cartels, 1981-2018

From Chapter 4

Fig. 4.2. Trends in Majority Party Cartels, 1981–2018. (Source: Voteview.com, calculated by the author.)

Trends in the distance between the veto override and filibuster “pivots” from 1981 and 2014 as measured with “Common Space” voting scores.

Figure 4-3. Trends in Gridlock Intervals, 1981-2014

From Chapter 4

Fig. 4.3. Trends in Gridlock Intervals, 1981–2014. (Source: Voteview.com, calculated by the author. Common Space scores were only available through 2014 when the data were collected.)

Trends in the absolute distance between the veto override and filibuster “pivots” and a voting score of 0 from 1981 and 2014 as measured with “Common Space” voting scores.

Figure 4-4. Voting Extremity of the Supermajoritarian Pivots, 1981-2014

From Chapter 4

Fig. 4.4. Voting Extremity of the Supermajoritarian Pivots, 1981–2014. (Source: Voteview.com, calculated by the author. Common Space scores were only available through 2014 when the data were collected.)

University of Michigan Press Contact Us

UMP EBC

  • Browse and Search
  • About UMP EBC
  • Impact and Usage

Follow Us

  • UMP EBC Newsletter
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • YouTube

Quicklinks

  • Help/FAQ
  • Title List
  • MARC Records
  • KBART Records
  • Usage Stats
© 2023, Regents of the University of Michigan · Accessibility · Preservation · Privacy · Terms of Service
Powered by Fulcrum logo · Log In
x This site requires cookies to function correctly.