University of Michigan needs your feedback to better understand how readers are using openly available ebooks. You can help by taking a short, privacy-friendly survey.
Focused on structural and political intersectionalities, Gendered Pluralism takes a broader approach to understanding the constellation of factors that drive gender and racial differences on an array of public policy issues. Belinda Robnett and Katherine Tate examine a broader set of actors absent the contextual factors that may drive them to compromise their opinions. Their study examines the ways in which (1) men and women differ on public policy issues and the factors that drive these differences; (2) whites and racial-ethnic minorities differ on public policy issues and the factors that drive these differences; (3) women differ on public policy issues and the factors that drive these differences; (4) African-American men and women differ on public policy issues and the factors that drive these differences; and (5) African-American women differ on public policy issues and the factors that drive these differences.
Figure 2.2. Histograms of Gap between Parent and Children or the Children of People Like Yourself on the Five Pillars of the American Dream (High Scores Represent More Difficulty for Children Than Parent)
Page 120 →Figure 6.1. Histograms of Eight Stereotypes about Black and White Women (Weighted Data; Negative scores represent negative opinions about Black women; positive scores represent negative opinions about White women)
Figure 7.1. Histogram of Masculine Type Stereotype about Lesbians and White Women (Weighted Data; Negative scores represent stereotyped opinions about lesbian women; positive scores represent stereotyped opinions about White women)
Figure 7.2. Histogram of Feminine Type Stereotype about Gay Men and White Men (Weighted Data; Negative scores represent stereotyped opinions about gay men; positive scores represent stereotyped opinions about White men)