Skip to main content
BAR Publishing
  • Help
  • About
  • Publish with BAR
  • Newsletter

Your use of this Platform is subject to BAR’s End User License Agreement. Please read it carefully. Materials on the Platform are for the use of authorised users only. Giving access in any form to non-authorised users is prohibited.

Share the story of what Open Access means to you

a graphic of a lock that is open, the universal logo for open access

University of Michigan needs your feedback to better understand how readers are using openly available ebooks. You can help by taking a short, privacy-friendly survey.

  1. Home
  2. Space and Time: Which Diachronies, Which Synchronies, Which Scales? / Typology vs. Technology: Sessions C64 and C65.

Space and Time: Which Diachronies, Which Synchronies, Which Scales? / Typology vs. Technology: Sessions C64 and C65.

Thierry Aubry, Francisco Almeida, Ana Cristina Araújo and Marc Tiffagom 2008 © BAR Publishing
Restricted You do not have access to this book. How to get access.
This book includes papers from the session 'Space and Time: Which Diachronies, which Synchronies, which Scales? / Typology vs Technology' held at the XV UISPP World Congress, Lisbon, September 2006.
Read Book Buy Book
Series
  • BAR pre-2020
  • BAR International Series pre-2020
ISBN(s)
  • 9781407303154 (paperback)
  • 9781407333304 (ebook)
BAR Number
  • S1831
Subject
  • Excavation / Fieldwork / Survey
  • Multiperiod
  • Lithics / Stone Tools
  • Western Europe and Britain
Citable Link
  • Table of Contents

  • Stats

  • Front Cover
  • Title Page
  • Copyright
  • NOTE OF THE SERIES EDITOR
  • TABLE OF CONTENTS
  • LIST OF FIGURES
  • LIST OF TABLES
  • C64 – ESPACE ET TEMPS: QUELLES DIACHRONIES, QUELLES SYNCHRONIES, QUELLES ECHELLES? ET C65 – TYPOLOGIE VS TECHNOLOGIE
  • SPACE AND TIME: WHICH DIACHRONIES, WHICH SYNCHRONIES, WHICH SCALES?
  • CARACTERISATION ET DISCONTINUITES DES REGISTRES PEDO-SEDIMENTAIRES DE L’OCCIDENT PENINSULAIRE ENTRE 30.000 ET 10.000 BP: IMPLICATION SUR L’INTERPRETATION ARCHEOLOGIQUE
  • APPROCHE PLURIDISCIPLINAIRE POUR LA RECONSTITUTION DE PROCESSUS PEDO-SEDIMENTAIRES ET ANTHROPIQUES PENDANT LE PLENIGLACIAIRE SUPERIEUR: APPLICATION AU OCCUPATIONS SOLUTREENNES DU SITE DES MAITREAUX (FRANCE)
  • LE GISEMENT PALEOLITHIQUE MOYEN ET SUPERIEUR DE COMBEMENUE (BRIGNAC-LA-PLAINE, CORREZE). DU MICROVESTIGE AU TERRITOIRE, REFLEXIONS SUR LES PERSPECTIVES D’UNE APPROCHE MULTISCALAIRE
  • DU SILEX, DE L’OS ET DES COQUILLAGES: MATIERES ET ESPACES GEOGRAPHIQUES DANS LE GRAVETTIEN PYRENEEN
  • L’EXPLOITATION DES MATIERES PREMIERES LITHIQUES AU MAGDALENIEN FINAL EN ESTREMADURE PORTUGAISE: DONNEES SUR LES SITES DE LAPA DOS COELHOS ET DE L’ABRI 1 DE VALE DOS COVÕES
  • BIG PUZZLES, SHORT STORIES: ADVANTAGES OF REFITTING FOR MICRO-SCALE SPATIAL ANALYSIS OF LITHIC SCATTERS FROM GRAVETTIAN OCCUPATIONS IN PORTUGUESE ESTREMADURA
  • LE FRACTIONNEMENT DES CHAINES DE DEBITAGE A ÉTIOLLES (ESSONNE, FRANCE): UN MOYEN DE DEFINIR L’ESPACE ET LE TEMPS DE L’OCCUPATION
  • L’APPORT DE LA METHODE DES REMONTAGES DANS L’EVALUATION DES PROCESSUS DE FORMATION ET D’ALTERATION DES DEPOTS ARCHEOLOGIQUES: LE CAS DE BARCA DO XEREZ DE BAIXO (PORTUGAL)
  • LES STRUCTURES DE COMBUSTION DE L’ESSART (POITIERS, VIENNE, FRANCE): DES EPANDAGES DE PIERRES AU FONCTIONNEMENT D’UN HABITAT MESOLITHIQUE
  • LE “BAGAGE” DES MAGDALÉNIENS: INDICES D'ARRIVÉES ET DE DÉPARTS A PARTIR DU MATERIEL EN SILEX DES CAMPEMENTS DE MONRUZ ET CHAMPREVEYRES (SUISSE)
  • TYPOLOGY VS TECHNOLOGY
  • TYPOLOGIE ET TECHNOLOGIE: ALLIEES OU OPPOSEES?
  • TECHNOLOGY VS. TYPOLOGY: THE CASE FOR AND AGAINST A TRANSITION FROM THE MSA TO THE LSA AT MUMBA CAVE, TANZANIA
  • TECHNOLOGY VS TYPOLOGY? THE CANTABRIAN ARCHAIC AURIGNACIAN/PROTOAURIGNACIAN EXAMPLE
  • GRAVETTIAN AND SOLUTREAN STONE TOOLS FROM VALE BOI (ALGARVE, PORTUGAL): TECHNO-TYPOLOGY VS. FUNCTION
  • INTERPRETATION TECHNO-ECONOMIQUE DES PRESENCES ET ABSENCES DANS LES REGISTRES ARCHEOLOGIQUES SOLUTREENS DU CENTRE DE LA FRANCE
  • TYPOLOGIE ET TECHNOLOGIE APRES LE SOLUTREEN / AVANT LE MAGDALENIEN REFLEXIONS SUR LA NATURE DES DEUX APPROCHES ET SUR LEUR UTILISATION DANS LA DEFINITION D’UNE “PHASE DE TRANSITION”
  • LE BADEGOULIEN DU BASSIN PARISIEN PRESENTE-T-IL DES “CARACTERES REGRESSIFS”? REFLEXIONS A PARTIR DE L’ETUDE DU GISEMENT DE PLEIN AIR DU MONT-ST-AUBIN A OISY (NIEVRE, FRANCE)
  • LES INDUSTRIES LITHIQUES DE LA FIN DU SOLUTREEN ET DU SALPETRIEN ANCIEN: APPORTS DE L’ETUDE TECHNOLOGIQUE A LA COMPREHENSION DE L’EVOLUTION CULTURELLE AU PLENIGLACIAIRE EN LANGUEDOC (FRANCE)
  • TYPOLOGIE VS TYPOLOGIE (SIC!) COMMENT LA TECHNOLOGIE CONTRIBUE A RAFFINER LA TYPOLOGIE DES ARMATURES LITHIQUES
  • WHICH BLANKS FOR WHICH TOOLS? TECHNO-TYPOLOGICAL ANALYSES OF THE SAUVETERRIAN INDUSTRY AT GALGENBUHEL (ITALY)
  • HUMAN OCCUPATION AT THE SOUTHERN PO PLAIN MARGIN IN THE EARLY MESOLITHIC: THE CONTRIBUTION OF TECHNOLOGICAL AND TYPOLOGICAL STUDIES
  • PALIMPSESTS, ASSEMBLAGES, PHASES & FACIES: THE CONUNDRUM OF TAXONOMIC GENERALIZATIONS FROM PARTICULAR ARCHEOLOGICAL CASES
3 views since February 28, 2020
BAR Publishing logo +44 (0)1865 310431 info@barpublishing.com www.barpublishing.com

FacebookTwitter

End User License Agreement

© BAR Publishing 2021

Powered by Fulcrum logo · Log In
x This site requires cookies to function correctly.