Skip to main content
BAR Publishing
  • Help
  • About
  • Publish with BAR
  • Newsletter

Your use of this Platform is subject to BAR’s End User License Agreement. Please read it carefully. Materials on the Platform are for the use of authorised users only. Giving access in any form to non-authorised users is prohibited.

Share the story of what Open Access means to you

a graphic of a lock that is open, the universal logo for open access

University of Michigan needs your feedback to better understand how readers are using openly available ebooks. You can help by taking a short, privacy-friendly survey.

  1. Home
  2. Gender and the Social Function of Athenian Tragedy

Gender and the Social Function of Athenian Tragedy

Spyros D. Syropoulos 2003 © BAR Publishing
Restricted You do not have access to this book. How to get access.
This study aims to re-examine Greek tragedy in order to find out how it influenced and determined the attitudes and perceptions of Athenian citizens. Greek tragedy covered many cultural issues, but this study is concerned centrally with how tragedies portrayed women on stage, and how these portrayals were interpreted by audiences who were used to regarding women as second-class citizens. All of the information we have today about Greek women comes entirely from male sources, so this means that we know only of how women were perceived by Greek men, not how they perceived themselves. Subsequently this study cannot directly reveal much at all about Greek women, but it can reveal a great deal about the society in which they lived and how it regarded those women. Importantly, therefore, Syropoulos focuses this study's emphasis onto the social function of tragedy and its relevant ideological and cultural importance. The period of study of this thesis stretches from Aeschylus' first play to Euripides' last (c500-405BC), and this is an important period of time for Athens as it is widely regarded as the time in which its culture was generally defined. These three main tragedians all held the belief, according to Syropoulos, that stepping outside of one's gender boundaries, which is a major gender theme amongst Greek tragedies, is generally harmful. This trend is shown in many of these plays, and implies that this was the general consensus amongst Athenians at this time. Syropoulos therefore classifies tragedy as a sort of 'cultural propaganda', in the sense that it was meant to keep society in balance because of the fact that gender-differentiation was an important basis for Greek culture.
Read Book Buy Book
Series
  • BAR pre-2020
  • BAR International Series pre-2020
ISBN(s)
  • 9781841715032 (paperback)
  • 9781407325262 (ebook)
BAR Number
  • S1127
Subject
  • Identity / Gender / Childhood / Ethnicity / Romanization
  • Greece, Aegean, Crete and Black Sea
  • Classical and Hellenistic
  • Epigraphy / Ancient and Medieval Texts / Papyri
Citable Link
  • Table of Contents

  • Stats

  • Front Cover
  • Copyright
  • Opening Quotation
  • Dedication
  • Introduction
  • Table of Contents
  • The Position of Women within Athenian Culture and Society
  • The Prominence of Women in Athenian Religion
  • A fragile political balance: Aeschylus' Suppliants
  • Familial perils: Euripides' Medea
  • Boundaries confused: Euripides' Bacchae
  • Right, Wrong and the tragic heroine. Antigone reconsidered
  • A woman's place in the oikos and society. Euripides' Alcestis.
  • Conclusions: Tragedy and didaskalia.
  • Bibliography
27 views since December 12, 2019
BAR Publishing logo +44 (0)1865 310431 info@barpublishing.com www.barpublishing.com

FacebookTwitter

End User License Agreement

© BAR Publishing 2021

Powered by Fulcrum logo · Log In
x This site requires cookies to function correctly.