Skip to main content
University of Michigan Press Ebook Collection

University of Michigan Press
Ebook Collection

Browse Books Help
Get access to more books. Log in with your institution.

Your use of this Platform is subject to the Fulcrum Terms of Service.

Share the story of what Open Access means to you

a graphic of a lock that is open, the universal logo for open access

University of Michigan needs your feedback to better understand how readers are using openly available ebooks. You can help by taking a short, privacy-friendly survey.

  1. Home
  2. Books
  3. The Politics of Military Force: Antimilitarism, Ideational Change, and Post-Cold War German Security Discourse

The Politics of Military Force: Antimilitarism, Ideational Change, and Post-Cold War German Security Discourse

Frank A. Stengel
Restricted You don't have access to this book. Please try to log in with your institution. Log in
Read Book Buy Book
  • Overview

  • Contents

The Politics of Military Force examines the dynamics of discursive change that made participation in military operations possible against the background of German antimilitarist culture. Once considered a strict taboo, so-called out-of-area operations have now become widely considered by German policymakers to be without alternative. The book argues that an understanding of how certain policies are made possible (in this case, military operations abroad and force transformation), one needs to focus on processes of discursive change that result in different policy options appearing rational, appropriate, feasible, or even self-evident. Drawing on Essex School discourse theory, the book develops a theoretical framework to understand how discursive change works, and elaborates on how discursive change makes once unthinkable policy options not only acceptable but even without alternative. Based on a detailed discourse analysis of more than 25 years of German parliamentary debates, The Politics of Military Force provides an explanation for: (1) the emergence of a new hegemonic discourse in German security policy after the end of the Cold War (discursive change), (2) the rearticulation of German antimilitarism in the process (ideational change/norm erosion) and (3) the resulting making-possible of military operations and force transformation (policy change). In doing so, the book also demonstrates the added value of a poststructuralist approach compared to the naive realism and linear conceptions of norm change so prominent in the study of German foreign policy and International Relations more generally.
  • Cover
  • Title Page
  • Copyright Page
  • Dedication
  • Contents
  • Foreword
  • Preface and Acknowledgments
  • List of Abbreviations
  • Introduction
  • Chapter 1. Hegemony and Social Transformation
  • Chapter 2. Hegemony Analysis as Reconstructive Social Research
  • Chapter 3. Creative Destruction
  • Chapter 4. Peace in Europe
  • Chapter 5. “Forward Defense” as a New Grand Strategy
  • Conclusion
  • Footnotes
  • References
  • Index
Citable Link
Published: 2020
Publisher: University of Michigan Press
ISBN(s)
  • 978-0-472-12731-3 (ebook)
  • 978-0-472-13221-8 (hardcover)
Series
  • Configurations: Critical Studies of World Politics
Subject
  • Political Science:International Relations
  • Political Science:Conflict Resolution & Peace Studies
  • German Studies

Resources

Search and Filter Resources

Filter search results by

Section

  • Chapter 13
  • Chapter 21
  • Chapter 32
  • Chapter 42
Filter search results by

Keyword

  • antagonism4
  • equivalence3
  • Federal Republic of Germany1
  • German Empire1
  • Nazi Germany1
  • more Keyword »
Filter search results by

Creator

  • Stengel, Frank7
  • Genç, Merve1
Filter search results by

Format

  • image8

Search Constraints

1 - 8 of 8
  • First Appearance
  • Section (Earliest First)
  • Section (Last First)
  • Format (A-Z)
  • Format (Z-A)
  • Year (Oldest First)
  • Year (Newest First)
Number of results to display per page
  • 10 per page
  • 20 per page
  • 50 per page
  • 100 per page
View results as:
List Gallery

Search Results

Three circles, each split by a horizontal line. The lower half of each circle displays the signifier “apple.” In the upper half, each circle displays a different symbol: in the first that of a whole apple, in the second that of an apple out of which a bite has been taken, and in the third a smiley face (symbolizing a person).

Signifiers and signifieds

From Chapter 1

Fig. 1. Signifiers and signifieds. (By Merve Genç, based on de Saussure 2011: 67.)

A text cycle showing the different stages of hegemonization: dislocation, discursive struggles between competing projects, identification with a specific project, hegemony, and institutionalization.

Hegemonization

From Chapter 1

Fig. 2. Hegemonization. (Based on Stengel and Nabers 2019: 256.)

Two opposing organization charts with two levels of hierarchy that represent the Self and the antagonistic Other, including the empty signifiers that represent the two. The rectangles that make up the Self are numbered D1 through Dn, symbolizing the individual demands articulated as equivalent within a specific discourse. The rectangles are split horizontally, the upper half being white, the lower half gray. The white part represents the particular content, the gray part the equivalential content.

The construction of a chain of equivalences

From Chapter 1

Fig. 3. The construction of a chain of equivalences. (Based on Laclau 2005a: 148.)

Set of concentric circles. The largest one is labeled “foreign policy discourse.” The smaller circle within it is labeled “security discourse.” Displayed within the smaller circle are three additional, partially overlapping circles, labeled “conflict prevention discourse,” “counterterrorism discourse,” and “counterpiracy discourse

Example for nested (sub-)discourses in a foreign policy discourse

From Chapter 2

Fig. 4. Example for nested (sub)discourses in a foreign policy discourse

Two lists of signifiers, juxtaposed by a double-headed arrow. The first list consists of “FRG - the West” in bold letters, followed by “democratic,” “liberal,” “peaceful - antimilitarist,” “Western - integrated,” “multilateral,” and “reliable - predictable.” The second list consists of “German Empire - Nazi Germany - Communism” in bold letters, followed by “authoritarian,” “oppressive,” “aggressive - militarist,” “deviant - isolated,” “unilateral,” and “unreliable - unpredictable.”

The FRG and its tyrannical other

From Chapter 3

Fig. 5. The FRG and its tyrannical Other. (Based on Nabers 2009: 206.)

Two opposing organization charts with two levels, rotated by 90 degrees, representing the Self and the Other, respectively, separated by a dotted line labeled “antagonistic frontier.” The Other, shown on the right, is labeled “tyranny” and made up of rectangles labeled “hypernationalism,” “unilateralism,” “special path - deviation,” “GDR,” “Nazi Germany,” “German Empire,” “Soviet Union,” “oppression,” “aggression,” “war,” and “bad,” respectively. The organizational chart on the left is labeled “freedom” and consists of rectangles labeled “reformed patriotism,” “multilateralism,” “Western integration,” “FRG,” “The West,” “Europe,” “democracy,” “peacefulness,” “liberalism,” “military reticence,” and “good,” respectively. Between the two charts but located closer to the Other is a single rectangle, labeled “military means - use of force.” A line connects it to the rectangle labeled “military reticence” that is part of the Self, indicating that “military means - use of force” has become rearticulated in such a way that it is not part of the Other anymore but can be incorporated into the chain of equivalences that makes up the Self. Two short lines crossing the antagonistic frontier indicate that it has been breached.

The breach of the antagonistic frontier

From Chapter 3

Fig. 6. The breach of the antagonistic frontier

Five rectangles, the first three gray, the last two white, with a dividing vertical line separating the gray rectangles from the white ones. The dividing line is labeled “super-differential boundary.” The gray rectangles are labeled “Military threats,” “WMD proliferation” and “Regional conflicts,” respectively. A label below them identifies them as part of “Security discourse.” The two white rectangles are labeled “Ecological problems” and “Underdevelopment,” respectively. A label below them identifies them as part of “Other discourses

The security discourse before the project of comprehensive security

From Chapter 4

Fig. 7. The security discourse before the project of comprehensive security

Two opposing organizational charts with two levels of hierarchy, representing opposing chains of equivalence, separated by a dotted line labeled “antagonistic frontier.” The chart at the top is labeled “Instability” and lists “Underdevelopment,” “Environmental problems,” “Tyranny - lack of democratic governance,” “Armed conflict,” “Deviance,” “Extremism - hypernationalism,” “The East,” and “The South” as constituent parts. The chart at the bottom is labeled “Comprehensive security” and lists “Military reticence,” “Environmental protection,” “Democracy,” “Human rights protection,” “Western - international integration,” “The West,” “Europe,” “NATO,” and “UN” as constituent parts.

The antagonistic frontier in the project of comprehensive security

From Chapter 4

Fig. 8. The antagonistic frontier in the project of comprehensive security

University of Michigan Press Contact Us

UMP EBC

  • Browse and Search
  • About UMP EBC
  • Impact and Usage

Follow Us

  • UMP EBC Newsletter
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • YouTube

Quicklinks

  • Help/FAQ
  • Title List
  • MARC Records
  • KBART Records
  • Usage Stats
© 2023, Regents of the University of Michigan · Accessibility · Preservation · Privacy · Terms of Service
Powered by Fulcrum logo · Log In
x This site requires cookies to function correctly.