Skip to main content
Kenneth G. Lieberthal and Richard H. Rogel Center for Chinese Studies
Fulcrum logo

Share the story of what Open Access means to you

a graphic of a lock that is open, the universal logo for open access

University of Michigan needs your feedback to better understand how readers are using openly available ebooks. You can help by taking a short, privacy-friendly survey.

  1. Home
  2. Kenneth G. Lieberthal and Richard H. Rogel Center for Chinese Studies
  3. The Imperial Style of Inquiry in Twentieth-Century China: The Emergence of New Approaches

The Imperial Style of Inquiry in Twentieth-Century China: The Emergence of New Approaches

Donald J. Munro 1996 Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International license Open access edition funded by the National Endowment for the Humanities / Andrew W. Mellon Foundation Humanities Open Book Program
Open Access Open Access
How have traditional Chinese ways of thinking affected problem solving in this century? The traditional, imperial style of inquiry is associated with the belief that the universe is a coherent, internally structured unity understandable through the similarly structured human mind. It involves a reliance on antecedent and authoritarian models, coupled with an introspective focus in investigations, at some cost to objective fact gathering.

In contrast, emergent forms of inquiry are guided by the values of individual autonomy and new perspectives on objectivity. In the 1930s and 1940s, some liberal educators held the model of Western science in great esteem, and some scientists practicing objective inquiry helped to create an awareness in the urban areas of inquiry not directed by political values.

Drawing on philosophical, social science, and popular culture materials, Donald Munro shows that the two strains coexisted in twentieth century China as mixed motives. Many important figures were motivated by a desire to act consistently with the social values associated with the premodern or received view of knowledge and inquiry. At the same time, these people often had other motives, such as utilitarian values, efficiency, and entrepreneurship. Munro argues that while many competing positions can coexist in the same person, the seeds of the positive, instrumental value of individual autonomy in Chinese inquiry are beginning to compete in both scholarly and popular culture with other, older approaches.

Read Book
  • EPUB (2.86 MB)
  • PDF (21.5 MB)
Buy Book
Series
  • Michigan Monographs in Chinese Studies
ISBN(s)
  • 978-0-89264-120-8 (hardcover)
  • 978-0-472-12782-5 (ebook)
  • 978-0-472-90178-4 (open access)
  • 978-0-472-03824-4 (paper)
Subject
  • Asian Studies:China
  • Philosophy
  • History:American Religious History
Citable Link
  • Table of Contents

  • Stats

  • Cover
  • Title Page
  • Copyright
  • Dedication
  • Contents
  • Preface
  • Acknowledgments
  • Abbreviations
  • Chapter One The Imperial Style of Inquiry
  • Chapter Two Modern Exemplars of the Imperial Style
  • Chapter Three Three Modern Models
  • Chapter Four The Emergence of Objectivity in Modern Chinese Inquiry
  • Chapter Five The Emergence of Autonomy as a Chinese Social Value
  • Notes
  • Glossary
  • Works Cited
  • Index
81 views since May 15, 2020
LSA Kenneth G. Lieberthal and Richard H. Rogel Center for Chinese Studies University of Michigan logo




  • University of Michigan Press

Powered by Fulcrum logo

  • About
  • Blog
  • Feedback
  • Contact
  • Contribute
  • Accessibility
  • Preservation
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Service
  • Log In
© 2020 Regents of the University of Michigan
x This site requires cookies to function correctly.