Skip to main content
Kenneth G. Lieberthal and Richard H. Rogel Center for Chinese Studies
Browse Books Help
Fulcrum logo
Get access to more books. Log in with your institution.

Your use of this Platform is subject to the Fulcrum Terms of Service.

Share the story of what Open Access means to you

a graphic of a lock that is open, the universal logo for open access

University of Michigan needs your feedback to better understand how readers are using openly available ebooks. You can help by taking a short, privacy-friendly survey.

  1. Home
  2. Kenneth G. Lieberthal and Richard H. Rogel Center for Chinese Studies
  3. The Imperial Style of Inquiry in Twentieth-Century China: The Emergence of New Approaches

The Imperial Style of Inquiry in Twentieth-Century China: The Emergence of New Approaches

Donald J. Munro
Open Access Open Access
Read Book
  • EPUB (2.86 MB)
  • PDF (21.5 MB)
Buy Book
  • Overview

  • Contents

  • Funder Information

How have traditional Chinese ways of thinking affected problem solving in this century? The traditional, imperial style of inquiry is associated with the belief that the universe is a coherent, internally structured unity understandable through the similarly structured human mind. It involves a reliance on antecedent and authoritarian models, coupled with an introspective focus in investigations, at some cost to objective fact gathering.

In contrast, emergent forms of inquiry are guided by the values of individual autonomy and new perspectives on objectivity. In the 1930s and 1940s, some liberal educators held the model of Western science in great esteem, and some scientists practicing objective inquiry helped to create an awareness in the urban areas of inquiry not directed by political values.

Drawing on philosophical, social science, and popular culture materials, Donald Munro shows that the two strains coexisted in twentieth century China as mixed motives. Many important figures were motivated by a desire to act consistently with the social values associated with the premodern or received view of knowledge and inquiry. At the same time, these people often had other motives, such as utilitarian values, efficiency, and entrepreneurship. Munro argues that while many competing positions can coexist in the same person, the seeds of the positive, instrumental value of individual autonomy in Chinese inquiry are beginning to compete in both scholarly and popular culture with other, older approaches.

  • Cover
  • Title Page
  • Copyright
  • Dedication
  • Contents
  • Preface
  • Acknowledgments
  • Abbreviations
  • Chapter One The Imperial Style of Inquiry
  • Chapter Two Modern Exemplars of the Imperial Style
  • Chapter Three Three Modern Models
  • Chapter Four The Emergence of Objectivity in Modern Chinese Inquiry
  • Chapter Five The Emergence of Autonomy as a Chinese Social Value
  • Notes
  • Glossary
  • Works Cited
  • Index
Open access edition funded by the National Endowment for the Humanities / Andrew W. Mellon Foundation Humanities Open Book Program
Citable Link
Published: 1996
Publisher: University of Michigan Center for Chinese Studies
License: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International license
ISBN(s)
  • 978-0-89264-120-8 (hardcover)
  • 978-0-472-03824-4 (paper)
  • 978-0-472-90178-4 (open access)
Series
  • Michigan Monographs in Chinese Studies
Subject
  • Asian Studies:China
  • Philosophy
  • History:American Religious History
LSA Kenneth G. Lieberthal and Richard H. Rogel Center for Chinese Studies University of Michigan logo




  • University of Michigan Press

Powered by Fulcrum logo

  • About
  • Blog
  • Feedback
  • Contact
  • Contribute
  • Accessibility
  • Preservation
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Service
  • Log In
© 2022 Regents of the University of Michigan
x This site requires cookies to function correctly.