Share the story of what Open Access means to you
![a graphic of a lock that is open, the universal logo for open access](/assets/oa-lock-logo-lg-a95dd8d9f9fe5e21ab4499ffd0c8661e55f7d788ae0a03f19a6749eb82e3e899.png)
University of Michigan needs your feedback to better understand how readers are using openly available ebooks. You can help by taking a short, privacy-friendly survey.
Ambition, Competition, and Electoral Reform: The Politics of Congressional Elections Across Time
Jamie L. Carson and Jason M. RobertsIn Ambition, Competition, and Electoral Reform, Jamie L. Carson and Jason M. Roberts present an original study of U.S. congressional elections and electoral institutions for 1872-1944 from a contemporary political science perspective. Using data on late nineteenth and early twentieth century congressional elections, the authors test the applicability in a historical context of modern political science theories, assess the effects of institutional reforms, and identify the factors that shape the competitiveness of elections. They present several key findings: the strategic politicians theory is applicable in an era without candidate-centered campaigns; there was an incumbency advantage prior to the full development of candidate-centered campaigns; institutional reforms have had a significant effect on elections; and the degree of electoral competition frequently correlates with elected officials' responsiveness to citizens.
-
Cover
-
Title
-
Copyright
-
Dedication
-
Contents
-
List of Tables
-
List of Figures
-
Acknowledgments
-
1 Introduction
-
2 History of U.S. House Elections
-
3 Institutional Change and Candidate Behavior
-
4 Exploring Historic and Modern Election Trends
-
5 The Politics of Candidate Emergence
-
6 The Incumbency Advantage in House Elections
-
7 Conclusions
-
Notes
-
References
-
Index
![](/image-service/8623hz72x1542726325/full/full/0/default.png)
- 978-0-472-11864-9 (hardcover)
- 978-0-472-03586-1 (paper)
- 978-0-472-02895-5 (ebook)