Skip to main content
Gabii Project Reports
Browse Books Help
Fulcrum logo

Your use of this Platform is subject to the Fulcrum Terms of Service.

Share the story of what Open Access means to you

a graphic of a lock that is open, the universal logo for open access

University of Michigan needs your feedback to better understand how readers are using openly available ebooks. You can help by taking a short, privacy-friendly survey.

  1. Home
  2. Gabii Project Reports
  3. A Mid-Republican House From Gabii

A Mid-Republican House From Gabii

Rachel Opitz, Marcello Mogetta, and Nicola Terrenato (Editors)

Written and crafted with Tyler Duane Johnson, Antonio F. Ferrandes, Laura Banducci, Francesca Alhaique, Laura Motta, Shannon Ness, Jason Farr, Samantha Lash, and Matthew Naglak
2016 Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International license © University of Michigan Press
Open Access Open Access
Since 2009 the Gabii Project, an international archaeological initiative led by Nicola Terrenato and the University of Michigan, has been investigating the ancient Latin town of Gabii, which was both a neighbor of, and a rival to, Rome in the first millennium BCE. The trajectory of Gabii, from an Iron Age settlement to a flourishing mid-Republican town to an Imperial agglomeration widely thought to be in decline, provides a new perspective on the dynamics of settlement in central Italy. This publication focuses on the construction, inhabitation, and repurposing of a private home at Gabii, built in the mid-Republican period. The remains of the house provide new information on the architecture and organization of domestic space in this period, adding to a limited corpus of well-dated examples. Importantly, the house's micro-history sheds light on the tensions between private and public development at Gabii as the town grew and reorganized itself in the mid- to late-Republican period transition. Published in digital form as a website backed up by a detailed database, the publication provides a synthesis of the excavation results linked to the relevant spatial, descriptive, and quantitative data.
Read Book
  • EPUB (11.8 MB)
Series
  • Gabii Project Reports
ISBN(s)
  • 978-0-472-99900-2 (e-book)
Subject
  • Classical Studies
  • Archaeology
Citable Link

  • Table of Contents

  • Resources

  • 3-D Model

  • Database

  • About

  • Stats

  • Cover
  • Title
  • Copyright
  • Table of Contents
  • Introduction
    • Dear Reader
      • Coming into the middle of the story
      • Thinking in terms of activities
      • The layered and linked text
      • Symbols for things and activities
    • Why Gabii? Why this town?
    • Project History in Brief
      • Prior Excavations
      • Preliminary Testing (2007–2008)
      • The Gabii Project Excavations (2009–2015)
      • Significance and Impact
    • Methods
      • Overview
      • Descriptive Data
      • Spatial Data
      • Archaeobotany and Zooarchaeology
      • The history of Gabii artifact methods and guiding principles
      • Contents and goals
      • Methods for collection and preliminary processing
      • Dating
      • Small finds study
    • Theory: The 3D models of the stratigraphy and material culture-centrism
    • Bibliography
  • The story of the house
  • More
    • The Tincu House architecture in its broader archaeological context
    • The House Lot
    • Before the House: The Early Iron Age and the Orientalizing, Archaic, and Early Republican Periods: Pre-Structures and Landscaping
    • The Mid-Republican Period: The House
      • Phases B-1a and B-1b: Initial construction and domestic life of the house
      • Phase B-2: Transformation
      • Phase B-3: Disuse and Obliteration
    • Relationships to contemporary domestic architecture at Gabii and in central Italy
    • Artifacts and Ecofacts from the Tincu House
      • Ceramics from the Tincu House
      • The Coins from the Tincu House
      • Notable objects from the Tincu House
      • Archaeobotanical Remains from the Tincu House
      • Zooarchaeological Evidence from the Tincu House
    • Conclusion
  • Details
    • Detailed Stratigraphic Analysis
      • Phase B-0: Pre-house structures and property limits
      • Phase B-1: Construction of the house
      • Phase B-2
    • Phase B-3
    • Building materials and local tufo—by Jason Farr
    • The archaeobotanical sampling and processing strategy—by Laura Motta
    • Zooarchaeological remains from the Tincu House at Gabii – —by Francesca Alhaique
      • Introduction: Character of the assemblage
      • Introduction: Terms and Methods
      • Phase B-0
      • Phase B-1: Assemblage
      • Phase B-1: Common Domestic Species
      • Phase B-1: Aquatic Species
      • Phase B-1: Avian Species
      • Phase B-1: Rare Species and microfauna
      • Phase B-2: Assemblage
      • Phase B-2: Common Domestic Species
      • Phase B-2: Aquatic Species
      • Phase B-2: Avian Species
      • Phase B-2: Rare species and microfauna
      • Phase B-3: Assemblage
      • Phase B-3: Common Domestic Species
      • Phase B-3: Aquatic species
      • Phase B-3: Avian species
      • Phase B-3: Rare species and microfauna
    • Discussion and Conclusions: Assemblage
    • Discussion and Conclusions: Common Domestic Species
    • Discussion and Conclusions: Aquatic Species
    • Discussion and Conclusions: Avian Species
    • Discussion and Conclusions: Rare species and microfauna
    • Discussion and Conclusions: General
    • The ceramic evidence: The stratigraphic deposits and their chronology—by A. Ferrandes (translated by M. Mogetta)
      • Introduction
      • Phase B-0 (5th c. BCE)
      • Phase B-1a (ca. 280/270–265/260 BCE)
      • Phase B-1b (late 3rd c. BCE–first quarter of 2nd c. BCE)
      • Phase B-2 (late 2nd / early 1st c. BCE)
      • Phase B-3 (second quarter / middle of 1st c. CE)
      • Preliminary conclusions and future directions
      • Footnotes for Discussion of the Ceramics
    • Notable Objects (Special Finds) from the Tincu House—by Shannon Ness
    • Catalog of Small Finds from the Tincu House
    • Coins from the Tincu House at Gabii—by Shannon Ness
      • Notes
  • Apologia
    • Methods in use during the excavation of the Tincu House
    • Preservation and Excavation Limits
    • Material Collection Methods
    • Documentation and study of Coins
    • Digital Documentation Methods
    • Specialist Study
  • Bibliography
    • Typological Abbreviations
  • Acknowledgments

Search and Filter Resources

Filter search results by

Section

  • Introduction6
  • More5
  • Details104
  • Apologia2
Filter search results by

Keyword

  • Archaeology1
  • Classical Studies1
Filter search results by

Creator

  • Jenkins, Zoe1
  • Terrenato, Nic1
Filter search results by

Format

  • image87
  • table30
  • video1
Filter search results by

Year

  • 20201

Search Constraints

« Previous | 1 - 20 of 118 | Next »
  • First Appearance
  • Section (Earliest First)
  • Section (Last First)
  • Format (A-Z)
  • Format (Z-A)
  • Year (Oldest First)
  • Year (Newest First)
Number of results to display per page
  • 10 per page
  • 20 per page
  • 50 per page
  • 100 per page
View results as:
List Gallery

Search Results

Activities icons used in the Gabii publications: abandonment, construction, dumping, living, reconstruction, transformation, and water management.

Symbols representing activities

From Introduction

Activities icons used in the Gabii publications: abandonment, construction, dumping, living, reconstruction, transformation, and water management.

Icons representing the types of evidence present at Gabii: fauna, ceramics, coins and other small objects, human remains, and flora.

Symbols representing types of data present

From Introduction

Icons representing the types of evidence present at Gabii: fauna, ceramics, coins and other small objects, human remains, and flora.

Gabii, located east of Rome, seen here in the context of key regional Italic centers (after Becker, Mogetta, and Terrenato 2009, fig. 1).

Regional Map for Gabii

From Introduction

Gabii, located east of Rome, seen here in the context of key regional Italic centers (after Becker, Mogetta, and Terrenato 2009, fig. 1).

Map of magnetometry results.

Map of magnetometry results

From Introduction

Map of magnetometry results.

New excavation areas are indicated by diamonds relative to key structures at Gabii (after Becker, Mogetta, and Terrenato 2009, fig. 2).

Local area around Gabii

From Introduction

New excavation areas are indicated by diamonds relative to key structures at Gabii (after Becker, Mogetta, and Terrenato 2009, fig. 2).

Elements pre-dating the construction of the house are visible here, preserved under the floors of Room B6.

Elements pre-dating the construction of the house

From More

Elements pre-dating the construction of the house are visible here, preserved under the floors of Room B6.

Overview of the excavated area at Gabii, with excavation areas labeled.

Overview of the excavated area at Gabii

From More

Overview of the excavated area at Gabii, with excavation areas labeled.

Area A of the Gabii Project's excavations. Likely drains surrounding the hypothesized house are highlighted.

Area A of the Gabii Project's excavations

From More

Area A of the Gabii Project's excavations. Likely drains surrounding the hypothesized house are highlighted.

The new entrance to the courtyard, associated with Phase B-2 of the structure. Note the basalt paving stones—a material not employed in the initial construction of the house—and some reused blocks (lower segment of the image).

New entrance to the courtyard

From More

The new entrance to the courtyard, associated with Phase B-2 of the structure. Note the basalt paving stones—a material not employed in the initial construction of the house—and some reused blocks (lower segment of the image).

Elements of the reconfigured courtyard, including new walls added to enclose a smaller space and a cut, from which a basin may have been removed.

Elements of the reconfigured courtyard

From More

Elements of the reconfigured courtyard, including new walls added to enclose a smaller space and a cut, from which a basin may have been removed.

Tincu house, charred archaeobotanical remains from floated samples

From Details

Charcoal is divided in potentially identifiable (>2mm) and not identifiable remains. X <10 fragments; XX 10-20 fragments; XXX 20-50 fragments; XXXX >50 fragments. Cereals include mostly distorted and fragmented remains of cultivated grasses that cannot be identified at the genus level.

The quantity of zooarchaeological remains per phase. Clearly, the distribution is quite uneven and skewed toward the abandonment phases.

Quantity of zooarchaeological remains per phase

From Details

The quantity of zooarchaeological remains per phase. Clearly, the distribution is quite uneven and skewed toward the abandonment phases.

The percentage of SUs from each phase containing zooarchaeological remains is correlated with the overall amount of zooarchaeological remains in each phase.

Percentage of SUs from each phase containing zooarchaeological remains

From Details

The percentage of SUs from each phase containing zooarchaeological remains is correlated with the overall amount of zooarchaeological remains in each phase.

In Phase B-1, the distribution of faunal remains is decidedly uneven.

Phase B-1, distribution of faunal remains

From Details

In Phase B-1, the distribution of faunal remains is decidedly uneven.

Faunal remains in Phase B-1 SUs

From Details

The uneven distribution of faunal remains in Phase B-1 SUs.

Taxa present in Phase B-1

From Details

Proportions of all taxa present in Phase B-1.

The relative proportions of the taxa present in the Phase B-1 assemblage.

Phase B-1, relative proportions of the taxa present

From Details

The relative proportions of the taxa present in the Phase B-1 assemblage.

Proportions of individuals of the taxa present in Phase B-1 assemblage

From Details

Proportions of individuals, as encapsulated by MNI counts, of the taxa present in the Phase B-1 assemblage.

Proportions of individuals, as encapsulated by MNI counts, of the taxa present in the Phase B-1 assemblage.

Phase B-1, proportions of individuals of the taxa present

From Details

Proportions of individuals, as encapsulated by MNI counts, of the taxa present in the Phase B-1 assemblage.

Proportions of meat yield in Phase B-1, suggesting that beef played the largest role in the local diet, followed by pork.

Phase B-1, proportions of meat yield

From Details

Proportions of meat yield in Phase B-1, suggesting that beef played the largest role in the local diet, followed by pork.

  • « Previous
  • Next »
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6

To view a textual reference for this feature in the publication, please use the following permalink (will open in a new window):

Click to open external database

Help

Technology, Accessibility, and Browser Compatibility

The Unity 3D platform used to host the 3D content for this volume is built on WebGL and is not compatible with some browsers and mobile devices. To access the 3D model, we recommend using a desktop or laptop computer and a modern web browser (Chrome 54+, Firefox 45+, Safari 10+, Edge 15, Opera 43+, more details). Unity’s documentation maintains a list of compatible browsers and graphics cards. To access database records linked in the 3D model, your browser must allow pop-ups (Chrome | Firefox | Safari | Opera).

If you do not wish to interact with the 3D model, or cannot use it, you may interact with the publication in Accessibility Mode. To enter Accessibility Mode, click the gear icon in the right corner of the e-reader, set Accessibility Mode to "on", and save your changes.

3D Model

The interactive content found in the 3D model serves as a visual reference for the narrative text. It contains 3D models of the site’s individual stratigraphic units, schematic reconstructions of key features, descriptive data, and direct links to entries from the project’s online database. Interaction with this content is essential to the way this publication communicates our interpretation of the Tincu House. Reconstructions and phase groupings, the toggles for which are accessed by undocking the menu at the left of the 3D interface, illustrate our understanding of the structure’s evolution. Links in the main text of the volume will guide you through a structured exploration of the house’s stratigraphy and the reconstructions developed by our team. Readers are encouraged both to follow the narrative laid out in the text and to explore the 3D content freely. Investigation into the data behind the interpretations and reconstructions is supported by access to the project’s database.

Within the 3D model viewer, you may move your mouse cursor over any icon to reveal its function. There are two viewing modes, “orbit view” and “explore on foot.” In “orbit view,” you may zoom in and out using the zoom bar on the right-hand side of the viewer. Clicking and dragging the left mouse button and dragging will move the camera. In “explore on foot” mode, the arrow keys or WASD keys control movement, and holding down the middle mouse button allows you to zoom in for a closer view of features.

Within the 3D model viewer, trowel icons are associated with each stratigraphic unit. Hovering over the trowel icon will cause the outline of that stratigraphic unit to glow red, providing a visual association between the trowel icon and the stratigraphic unit for which it contains information. Clicking on any trowel icon will pull up basic information on the stratigraphic unit associated with the icon. The basic information presentation here uses the system of symbols described in the introduction to this volume. The “go to ark” button provides a link to the database entry for the relevant stratigraphic unit. The trowel icons for any given stratigraphic unit appear as you move closer to it, and disappear again as you move away. If no trowel icon appears for a stratigraphic unit, and you wish to access information about it, move closer until the trowel icon appears.

The 3D content for this volume is designed for a laptop or desktop device. Using smaller mobile devices may result in unexpected behavior and changes in layout.

Feedback

While the content for A Mid-Republican House From Gabii is finalized, the platform University of Michigan Press has developed to host this online publication will continue to be developed. In order to improve the user experience around this publication and others like it, we would appreciate your feedback, comments, or identified software bugs. Please fill out this form or send an e-mail to umpress-gabii@umich.edu. If you are experiencing issues with access to this publication, please e-mail mpub-access@umich.edu.

10,162 views since March 27, 2018

Gabii Project Reports logo


Gabii Project Reports

Powered by Fulcrum logo

  • About
  • Blog
  • Feedback
  • Contact
  • Contribute
  • Accessibility
  • Preservation
  • Privacy
  • Terms of Service
  • Log In
© 2021 University of Michigan Press
x This site requires cookies to function correctly.